الوهّابية (Al-Wahhābiyyah) - Philosophical Concept | Alexandria

الوهّابية (Al-Wahhābiyyah) - Philosophical Concept | Alexandria
Al-Wahhabiyyah: A term frequently encountered in discussions of Islamic history and theology, Al-Wahhabiyyah refers to a religious reform movement within Sunni Islam. Emerging in the 18th century, it is often described as a strict, puritanical, or fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. Yet, such labels can obscure a more nuanced reality, begging the question: is the common perception an accurate portrayal or a reflection of historical and political biases? The term surfaced in the mid-18th century, initially used by detractors to describe the teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703-1792). Primary sources from this era, including correspondence between scholars and Ottoman officials, reveal a swirling controversy surrounding Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's call to purify Islamic practice from perceived innovations and deviations. His movement arose amidst the decline of the Ottoman Empire and the spread of Sufi orders, a period ripe with intellectual and political ferment that provides a compelling backdrop to its emergence. Over time, interpretations of Al-Wahhabiyyah have undergone significant transformations. The movement’s alliance with the House of Saud shaped its trajectory, leading to the establishment of the first Saudi state. Later, encounters with Western colonialism and the rise of modern nation-states further influenced its development. Intriguingly, aspects of Wahhabism have been adopted or adapted by various groups, some supportive of political quietism and others advocating active engagement or even violence. The legacy of thinkers like Ibn Taymiyyah significantly contribute to the movement's philosophical underpinnings, but the extent to which their views align neatly with modern interpretations remains a subject of scholarly debate. Today, Al-Wahhabiyyah continues to play a significant, often contentious, role in shaping Islamic discourse and geopolitical dynamics. Contemporary debates often center on issues of religious authority, the role of tradition, and the interpretation of Islamic law. The term itself carries considerable symbolic weight, often wielded as both a badge of honor and a term of condemnation. Ultimately, the question remains: can a single label truly capture the diverse and evolving interpretations of a movement that continues to inspire and provoke across the globe?
View in Alexandria